NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL



NATIONAL LAW JOURNAL
Supreme Court Brief
POWERED BY LAW.COM
Tony Mauro
Marcia Coyle
Apr 16, 2018
Good morning! The Supreme Court returns to the bench for its final two-week argument session for the current term. It will be an important two weeks, giving the justices plenty of work to do to get all their decisions written during the May crunch. We’re expecting some decisions this week, but first off, we take a look at a key patent case being argued today, and petitions the court might act on to bulk up its docket for next term.

Thanks for reading Supreme Court Brief. We welcome feedback at tmauro@alm.com and mcoyle@alm.com.
 
A Sea Change in Patent Law?
Justice Stephen Breyer must be feeling pretty prescient these days. In his 2015 book, “The Court and The World,” he wrote, “More and more, cases before the court involve foreign activity … It has become clear that, even in ordinary matters, judicial awareness can no longer stop at the border.”

The court’s final oral argument session for the term, beginning today, illustrates how correct Breyer was. Bookending the session are today’s WesternGeco LLC v. ION Geophysical Corp. on patent damages in foreign markets, and on April 25 the court will hear the intensely disputed travel ban case Trump v. Hawaii. In between is Animal Science Products v. Hebei Welcome Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., asking whether U.S. courts must defer to foreign countries’ interpretation of their own domestic law. This case will be argued April 24.

We’ll have more later on the travel ban and foreign legal interpretation cases. For now, here’s a look at today’s WesternGeco case, which underscores Breyer’s thesis in the sense that these foreign cases draw top-tier lawyers to the lectern.

Former Solicitor General Paul Clement of Kirkland & Ellis will argue for WesternGeco, going up against Williams & Connolly’Kannon Shanmugam for ION. It’s the first time they will square off together at the high court, though they have argued on opposite sides at the U.S. Court of Appeal for the Federal Circuit at least once.

Another measure of its importance may be the fact that Justice Samuel Alito Jr., who was recused in the case when it was first granted in January, “un-recused” himself on March 28, likely the result of him selling stocks in Schlumberger Limited, the parent company of WesternGeco. Maybe Alito didn’t want to miss the show.

The case is an important test of the territorial boundaries for imposing damages in patent infringement cases. WesternGeco is looking for infringement damages from ION for the profits it made through third parties in foreign markets. But ION, which sells components used to search for oil and gas under the ocean floor, claims that “the presumption against extraterritoriality … is at its peak in patent cases.”

The solicitor general’s office has weighed in on WesternGeco’s side, arguing that the Federal Circuit ruling against extraterritorial damages "systematically undercompensates U.S. patent owners for infringement when the patent owner derives profits from cross-border commerce."

Our colleague Scott Graham, who writes for our sibling IP newsletter Skilled in the Art, recently offered these thoughts about the case:

➤➤ “A big, gaping question remains: whether the court's ruling will be confined to damages for induced infringement under Section 271(f) [of the Patent Act]—which targets the supply of components that are combined overseas—or whether it might expand to cover any damages arising from overseas sales of products that infringe U.S. patents.

➤➤ The SG’s position “worries the Electronic Frontier Foundation and the R Street Institute, two amici curiae often aligned with the tech industry. ‘The court’s ruling in this case could vastly expand the reach of U.S. patent law,’ the groups warn in a brief … ‘Expanding patent damages in this way would effectively transform every U.S. patent into a worldwide patent.’

➤➤ “Backing ION is a group of law professors led by Emory's Timothy Holbrook. They ask the high court to clarify that the presumption against extraterritoriality applies to all remedial statutes, not just the patent laws. ‘This court has never squarely addressed whether the presumption applies to remedial provisions,’ their brief states.

Others also think the court’s decision in WesternGeco could have broad impact. Aaron Fahrenkrog, partner at Robins Kaplan, sent these observations our way:
• “The WesternGeco case is not just about offshore activity and limits on extraterritoriality. Beneath the surface, it is about the fundamental principles underlying how patent owners should be compensated for infringement.”

• “The Supreme Court has the opportunity to course-correct how damages should be proven in any patent case, for the benefit of all those—including patent owners, accused infringers, and the courts—involved in the patent system. This case about the high seas could trigger a sea change in U.S. patent law.”
Check back at NLJ and the Supreme Court Brief for additional coverage of the argument—and more.
 
Conference Watch: Five Cases to Watch
The justices are moving slowly but surely towards the end of the term. They have granted review in eight cases—6 civil, 2 criminal—for the October 2018 term. Watch for the pace of grants to pick up between now and the end of June.
We're watching this morning's orders list for five petitions in particular, one of which—Azar v. Garza—has been on the justices' conference list a whopping nine times. All five have veteran Supreme Court advocates pitching the petitions to the high court.

➤➤ Azar v. Garza
U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco and Sidley Austin partner Carter Phillips are opponents in this petition in which Francisco wants the justices to vacate a D.C. Circuit decision granting relief to a pregnant immigrant minor who wanted an abortion. Francisco also asks that the case be sent back to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief. The SG's office also asked the justices to consider imposing sanctions on the minor's lawyers at the American Civil Liberties Union for allegedly misrepresenting to the government the timing of the minor's abortion. Phillips rejects the assertion.

➤➤ Blagojevich v. United States
Goldstein & Russell's Thomas Goldstein is representing former Illinois governor Rod Blagojevich, who is serving a 14-year prison sentence for soliciting campaign contributions in violation of the Hobbs Act. Goldstein asks the justices whether the government must prove a defendant made an explicit promise or undertaking in exchange for the contribution, or only that the public official took the payment knowing it was made in return for official acts. The petition argues there is a 5-3 circuit split over the quid pro quo standard in campaign contribution cases.

➤➤ Ulbricht v. United States
Ross Ulbricht, represented by Williams & Connolly partner Kannon Shanmugamchallenges his sentence and the government's warrantless seizure of his private Internet traffic information, which was used to arrest and convict him of drug trafficking and related offenses. Ulbricht, creator of the Silk Road website, was sentenced to life without parole. Shanmugam urges the court to grant review to decide the Fourth Amendment question, or hold the case pending its decision in Carpenter v. United States, "which may articulate principles applicable here."

➤➤ Gilead Sciences, Inc. v. United States ex rel. Campie
Big business and pharma are supporting this False Claims Act petition in which E. Joshua Rosenkranz of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe, representing Gilead, asks if an FCA allegation fails because of immateriality when the government continued to approve and pay for products after learning of alleged regulatory infractions.

➤➤ Medical Device Business Services v. United States ex rel. Nargol
Another False Claims Act petition—this time filed by Kirkland & Ellis partner Paul Clement— challenges a relator who alleged defects in DePuy hip implants. The petition asks whether a relator can satisfy the particularity requirement in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 9(b) without pleading a specific false claim submitted to the government.
 
#AlwaysaSCOTUSangle

Supreme Court advocate Peter Stris of Stris & Maher represents the former Playboy model who became pregnant during an affair with the former Republican National Committee deputy finance chairman. The GOP official paid her $1.6 million in a deal allegedly arranged by President Trump's personal lawyer Michael Cohen. Stris also represents former Playboy model Karen McDougal in a lawsuit related to her alleged affair with Trump. Stris has argued seven high court cases, most recently Microsoft v. Baker in 2016.
 
Video: Georgetown Law's Joshua Geltzer Catches Up With Marcia Coyle

Marcia here—I caught up last week with Joshua Geltzer, founding executive director of the Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection at Georgetown University Law Center, about the latest advocacy initiatives and what to watch in litigation over sanctuary cities and the Trump administration's travel ban.

➤➤ Watch my video interview here.
 
ICYMI: RBG Presides Over Naturalization Ceremony 

--> Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein would make his U.S. Supreme Court debut in a sentencing guidelines case on April 23—if he's still the deputy attorney general then.

--> The Los Angeles Times looks at the SG's position in the SEC administrative law judges case—and what the stance might mean for any pressure to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller.

--> The U.S. Supreme Court hasn't offered much guidance on the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege.

--> Some judicial nominees—whether for appellate courts or the Supreme Court—are reluctant to endorse Brown v. Board of Education.

--> Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg presided over a naturalization ceremony at the New York Historical Society on April 10.

--> Two lawyers from Cozen O'ConnorStephen Miller, a former Antonin Scalia clerk, and Pamela Dorianreview this term's dispute over a state ban on political apparel at polling places.
Thanks for reading Supreme Court Brief. We welcome feedback at tmauro@alm.com and mcoyle@alm.com.
—Tony and Marcia
TRENDING STORIES

Michael Cohen's Attorneys Claim Thousands of Privileged Documents Scooped Up in Raid

NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL

Prosecutors Say Cohen Under Investigation, Rebut Privilege Claims

NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL

AP Article on Another National Enquirer 'Catch & Kill' Trump Story Notes Role Played by Boies Schiller

THE AMERICAN LAWYER

Allen & Overy Faces Skepticism Over O'Melveny Merger as Doubts Emerge Among Partnership

INTERNATIONAL

Trump Lawyer Michael Cohen Was Discreet Presence at Squire Patton Boggs

NEW YORK LAW JOURNAL





Gorsuch Hires Native American Law Clerk, Likely First in SCOTUS History

"Justice Gorsuch has already brought a diverse group of clerks to the court and I am honored to deepen that diversity,"... Read More

Questions Over Collection and Review Pile Up in Mueller Investigation

In the ongoing investigation involving evidence of varying data types from various sources, questions over evidence... Read More



ELECTION AND POLITICAL LAW

Newt Gingrich Departs From Dentons

By Ryan Lovelace
Mike McNamara, Dentons CEO in the U.S., sent an internal email obtained by ALM to firm employees Monday saying that... Read More


Gorsuch Hires Native American Law Clerk, Likely First in SCOTUS History

"Justice Gorsuch has already brought a diverse group of clerks to the court and I am honored to deepen that diversity,"... Read More


Yale Law's James Forman Jr., Former O'Connor Clerk, Wins Pulitzer

“Clerking exposed me to the dreary state of criminal defense representation in trial courts around the country," Forman... Read More







Comments

MOST POPULAR

NYT Editorial Board cites POGO

The Post Most: Syria says strike on military base carried out by Israeli warplanes

House memo states disputed dossier was key to FBI's FISA warrant to surveil members of Team Trump

National Law Journal

The Big Mac And The Crocodile

The Daily 202: Trump launches a rescue mission to save GOP seat in Pennsylvania special election.....

The Post Most: Paul Ryan celebrated the tax cut with a tweet about a secretary saving $1.50 a week